The heirarchy as you wrote it, and the way to handle disputes, I think is well done.
What I"m saying is that in order to make sure the RPC isn't pulled into stupid disputes that aren't really affecting the whole group you should word that section more clearly. Like the RPC saying only griefing, chronic god-modding or harrasment are issues that affect the whole community and will be dealt with on that level. If you leave it ambigious you'll have to decide on anything they bring that is at issue. Like in my above example a dispute betwwen 2 guilds can be over something petty that neither side can agree one but how would a guild name negatively affect the entire RPC Community. The two guilds can agree to disagree and just drop it and as long as it doesn't escalate to the degree of harassment why would the RPC have to intervene? Just make it clear unless its one of the things ruled against the "charter" its not a big enough deal for the RPC to get involved.
What I"m saying is that in order to make sure the RPC isn't pulled into stupid disputes that aren't really affecting the whole group you should word that section more clearly. Like the RPC saying only griefing, chronic god-modding or harrasment are issues that affect the whole community and will be dealt with on that level. If you leave it ambigious you'll have to decide on anything they bring that is at issue. Like in my above example a dispute betwwen 2 guilds can be over something petty that neither side can agree one but how would a guild name negatively affect the entire RPC Community. The two guilds can agree to disagree and just drop it and as long as it doesn't escalate to the degree of harassment why would the RPC have to intervene? Just make it clear unless its one of the things ruled against the "charter" its not a big enough deal for the RPC to get involved.