(04-30-2015, 10:01 PM)Natalie Mcbeef Wrote:You could simply go back, and put in a note saying *this opinion has been changed, please disregard this point* that would not generate a warning, as the flow has not been changed, nor has the point that generated the argument in the first place.(04-30-2015, 09:53 PM)Nako Wrote:(04-30-2015, 09:49 PM)Natalie Mcbeef Wrote:statement of opinion does not make it an attack.(04-30-2015, 09:48 PM)ArmachiA Wrote:(04-30-2015, 09:47 PM)Natalie Mcbeef Wrote: A prime example of the sort of passive aggressive personal attacks that these policies will not fix.
That's isn't the definition of passive aggressive. I'm being quite blunt. Â it seems to me your are looking for arguments
Ok so just a regularly aggressive personal attack then?
It looks like you are looking for arguments, over opinions and facts that were clarified. Whether or not this is the case is another matter, this is what it looks like.
Well to start, I was responding to this post:
(04-30-2015, 09:24 PM)Kellach Woods Wrote: Also, why do you feel the need to warn about the inflammatory content? Why is it necessary? Seriously I do not get that point at all. Just yolo post, edit it out if you realize that's not what you wanted to say upon reread. Like I just did.
However if someone makes a point that ends up generating a warning, and then they edit it later, even if it's because they changed their mind, suddenly that becomes an offence. I was never saying that someone making grammatical corrections is punishable.
Changing a post that says something offensive, mean, rulebreaking, into one that does not break the rules IS against the rules.
As far as I understand.
Please, mods, Freelance, correct me if I am wrong, but I was under the impression that it was editing a post once an argument had been started, in order to claim that you didnt say what they are claiming you said.
Aduu Avagnar, The Wanderer: Wiki
