(11-28-2017, 11:08 PM)LiadansWhisper Wrote:(11-27-2017, 01:02 PM)Valence Wrote: It depends on how invasive the voidsent was.
The harmfulness of eating parts of said voidsent? Â What are you basing that off of, if I may ask?
I'm not totally sure to see your point. I was answering to Gegenji's remark on the "complete and utter change over the victim's body". There is examples where the voidsent isn't doing anything to the body, at least for a while.
(11-28-2017, 11:08 PM)LiadansWhisper Wrote:Quote:The one that inhabits the aether poor relative to the Coco brothers in the THM quests for example, doesn't seem to really harm its host in any meaningful way.
Wasn't it killing him? Â Like, it left no lasting damage once removed, but wasn't he going to die because it was inhabiting him?
Was it killing him though?
I know that removing voidsent forcefully from their hosts always seem to end in the death of the host, thus why eorzeans generally just kill them off the bat when they can because they consider them lost already. But besides that...
The quest speaks a great deal about that if I remember correctly. I will have to check, I'm at work.
(11-28-2017, 11:08 PM)LiadansWhisper Wrote:Quote:The one that is after Arya's lineage in the RDM quests left a taint that could be removed.
Some change their victims completely, like the Tonberries were, and while a cure is still being investigated, there is no way to heal them of their affliction.
But they weren't inhabited, they were cursed. Â The voidsent inhabited something else.
I never said anywhere Arya was inhabited. I said she had a taint transmitted through her lineage.
I never said Tonberries were either.
But let's say that we are speaking about inhabitation though, then yes, those aren't probably the best examples then!
However, what do you call cursed exactly? Not a physical taint? A spell?
Balmung:Â Suen Shyu
